Yeshua bar Yosef A.K.A. Jesus Christ


But you fail to understand that? You have no eye for something that needed two millennia to emerge victorious? . . . That's nothing to wonder at: all lengthy things are hard to see, to assess. However, that's what took place: out of the trunk of that tree of vengeance and hatred, Jewish hatred, the deepest and most sublime hatred, that is, a hatred which creates ideals and transforms values—something whose like has never been seen on earth—from that grew something just as incomparable, a new love, the deepest and most sublime of all the forms of love. From what other trunk could that have grown? 
However, you must not make the mistake of thinking that this love arose essentially as the denial of that thirst for vengeance, as the opposite of Jewish hatred. No. The reverse is the truth! This love grew out of that hatred, as its crown, as the victorious crown extending itself wider and wider in the purest brightness and sunshine, which, so to speak, was seeking for the kingdom of light and height, the goal of that hate—aiming for victory, trophies, seduction—with the same urgency with which the roots of that hatred were sinking down ever deeper and more greedily into everything deep and evil. 
Take this Jesus of Nazareth, the bodily evangelist of love, the "Saviour," who brought holiness and victory to the poor, to the sick, to the sinners. Was he not in fact seduction in its most terrible and irresistible form, the seduction and detour to exactly those Judaic values and new ideals? Didn't Israel in fact attain, with the detour of this "Saviour," with this apparent enemy to and dissolver of Israel, the final goal of its sublime thirst for vengeance? Isn't it part of the secret black art of a truly great politics of vengeance, a far-sighted, underground, slowly expropriating, and premeditated revenge, that Israel itself had to disown and nail to the cross the tool essential to its revenge before all the world, so that "all the world," that is, all Israel's enemies, could then swallow this bait? 
On the other hand, could anyone, using the full subtlety of his mind, imagine a more dangerous bait? Something to match the enticing, intoxicating, narcotizing, corrupting power of that symbol of the "holy cross," that ghastly paradox of a "god on the cross," that mystery of an unimaginable and ultimate cruelty and self-crucifixion of god for the salvation of mankind? . . . At least it is certain that sub hoc signo [under this sign] Israel, with its vengeance and revaluation of the worth of all other previous values, has triumphed again and again over all other ideals, over all nobler ideals.  
-Friederich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, First Essay, 8.


Some christians so called "White Nationalists" say that "Jesus was not jewish" in order to make compatible their religion and at the same time their antisemitism.

They argue also that "Jesus rebelled against the Jews", and they wish to see an "antisemite Jesus". But, according to the Gospel, which is the only source on his existence, Jesus did not rebel against "the Jews" in a general way, but against a very specific type of Jewish group: the Jewish Pharisees (John 8), who were the religious authority of his time, because he considered them to be failing to the true Judaism, so, actually christianity (not called like that by early christians) started claiming they were defending Judaism and were the TRUE JEWS! (Revelations 3:9).

 Jewish Law established that Jews should be united and help each other, they should avoid having poor among them, and forgive and forget loans after seven years, but it was permissible to apply usury to THE NATIONS (Goym).

 The famous scene of the expulsion of the merchants from the Jewish Temple (Matthew, 21: 12-13) clearly shows that Jesus here simply shows indignation that his fellow Jews are not really following the Law as they should, because they began to do to their own people what should be done only to the Goym. So they forgot the "divinity" and the "sanctity" of their commandments, the racial unity and identity that their religious Law had given them. Therefore, these passages actually speak to us of a series of condemnations by a group of Jews against another group of Jews who are accused to not following the true Judaism: "those who claim to be Jews and are not Jews" (Revelations 3:9).

 They say also that "Judaism hate Christianity and vice versa". Of course they hate each other. So what? Is not their doctrines nature to hate everything that is not theirs? Jews hate paganism too and the historical hatred of christians against everything that is "pagan", comes from the historical hatred of the Jews. To say that Judaism hate Christianity or vice versa is irrelevant. It is a silly thought to say that if two things are opposed, and one of them is considered evil, then the other must be "good". It is like thinking that if marxism is evil, then capitalism must be "good". In fact the only reason why Judaism seems to be opposed to Christianity is because it was seen as heretic, schismatic and caused a conflicting effect among the Jews themselves. That is why Jews must teach their own people that Jesus is being punished in hell. It would be a catastrophe for them that their own people become massively to a inherently destructive doctrine. It would be falling into their own trap. But later this heretic doctrine served well to them for their purposes of world conquer, making all goyim to worship their jewish god Yahweh.


But, what do they have to say about these following facts?

1. The name "Jesus" comes from the hebrew יהושע (Yehoshua or Joshua) and ישוע (Yeshua) Aramaic, meaning "Yahweh is salvation".

2. Jesus was circumcised eight days after his birth, according to JEWISH law (Luke 2:21-23) .

3. In the Gospels it is narrated that Jesus' father was Yosef יוֹסֵף (Joseph), a Jewish carpenter from the Jewish House of David, and his mother, Miriam מִרְיָם (Mary), of the Jewish family of David and the Jewish tribe of Judah. Both observed the Jewish Torah (Luke 2:39) and Jewish Passover (Luke 2:41). According to the Gospel of Luke (1: 5.36), the Jewish angel Gabriel (from the hebrew  גַּבְרִיאֵל "God is my strength"), appeared to Miriam and announced that she would give birth to a son whom Yahweh "will give him the Jewish throne of David his father, and he shall reign in the Jewish house of Jacob ". An angel announces to Joseph that Mary's pregnancy is because the Holy Spirit and prophesied, in the words of the Jewish prophet Isaiah that his son will be the Jewish Messiah expected by the Jews (Matthew 1: 19-21).

4. The word "Messiah" is hebraical, מָשִׁיחַ (mashiach), it comes from Judaism and literally means "the anointed one", in reference of Hebrew kings who were anointed in oils as a consecration act. Later, Judaized Greeks wanted to translate this word into Greek, and the word used was Χριστός (Christós) "Christ", with the same hebraical meaning.

5. In Matthew 2: 1-2, some "wise men from the East" visited the Messiah following a star and asking: "Where is the one who has been born king of the Jews?"

6. Matthew 21: 9 describes how the Jewish crowds in Jerusalem hail Jesus shouting, "Hosanna to the Son of David!". The Hebrew word הושענות Hosanna means "save now."

7. Yeshua teach his doctrine in accordance with the JEWISH scriptures of Old Testament.

8. He went to JEWISH synagogues (Luke 4:16, Luke 21:37)

9. He evoked the JEWISH prophets in these synagoges (Luke 4: 16-30)

10. He observed jewish feasts like Passover (John 2:13), Succot or Tabernacles (John 7:2,10,14) and Hanukah (John 10:22,23).

11. Was called "Rabbi"  רַבִּי ('my master' in Hebrew) (John 4:31, John 3:1-2, John 6:25).

12. Urged people to fulfill the JEWISH law of Moses מֹשֶׁה:
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 5:17-19. 
13. In John 4:9 it says:
Then the woman of Samaria said to Him, "How is it that You, being a Jew, ask a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?"
And 4:22, Jesus said to the Samaritan woman (non Jewish):
"You worship what you do not know; we worship what we know, for salvation is from the Jews."
14. In the "Gospel" is demonstrated that the doctrine of Jesus was addressed only to the Jews when he says to the twelve apostles, "Don't go into the way of the Gentiles, but only to the lost sheep of Israel" (Matthew 10: 5 -6) and "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of Israel" (Matthew 15:24). These words indicate back to pick up in the lap of Orthodox Judaism, to whom have strayed from the Law of Moses: "If you believed in Moses you would believe me" (John 5:46).

 15. Jesus accepted to be the King of the JEWS when questioned by Pontius Pilate (Matthew, 27:11).

One that says that Jesus was not Jewish, only wants to deceive you. Christianity is a foreign doctrine, made by preachers from the desert, aliens to the blood, mind and spirit of Europe. It doesn't represent our authentic Blood and Soil.

A "Word of the Lord"


Matthew 15:21-28 is the concise quote of "New Testament" that disproves once and for all, a Christianity for a true White-European nationalist, because shows that Jesus was just a Jewish supremacist:
Leaving that place, Jesus withdrew to the region of Tyre and Sidon. A Canaanite (goy/non-jew) woman from that vicinity came to him, crying out, "Lord, Son of David, have mercy on me! My daughter is demon-possessed and suffering terribly." 
Jesus did not answer a word. So his disciples came to him and urged him, "Send her away, for she keeps crying out after us."
He answered, "I was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel (jews)." 
The woman came and knelt before him. "Lord, help me!" she said. 
He replied, "It is not right to take the children’s (jews) bread and toss it to the dogs (non-jews)." 
"It is true, Lord," she said. "But even the dogs eat the crumbs that fall from their master’s table."
Then Jesus said to her, "Woman, you have great faith! Your request is granted.” And her daughter was healed at that moment.
So, what can we learn from these words?

 To receive from Jesus that for which it was sent (not even "the bread" but just the "crumbs"), a non-Jewish woman must be accept the rank of inferiority ("the dogs") regarding Jews ("the children", "the masters") and only then Jesus agreed to heal her daughter. "So, goyim, we are merciful, and if you want our mercy you need to accept that you are inferior to us". That is the teaching here, plain and simple.

Why the European Religion?

By Varg Vikernes.

http://thuleanperspective.com/2013/07/31/why-the-european-religion/
The native European religion, traditions, customs, culture and world view, is known in slightly different hues from all over Ancient Europe. This Pagan religion is the religion of our blood and soil, and like a mind can not be separated from the body this religion can not be separated from us; without it we will cease to be. Without it we will die, like we do today, because we don’t practise it. With the re-introduction of the European religion we will start to live like we did before, in harmony with ourselves and our environment, and be able to cultivate our racial peculiarities, known to have brought forth philosophy, mathematics, architecture, beautiful music, sculptures, paintings, poetry, medicine, astronomy and all sorts of technology.

 The European religion promotes not some fictional otherworldly “Paradise” as the ultimate goal for each individual man, but instead the eternal life on the soil of the forebears, and immortality through Honour. There is no contempt for the Earth, no description of Earth as something you have to “endure” or “tolerate” until you can move on to something better. The European religion promotes the Earth and life on Earth as something good, valuable and meaningful, and holds the Honourable life as the highest ideal. Life is lived with the betterment of everything in mind, the preservation of the good and the promotion of Honour: the Honourable European Pagan lives his life knowing – or if you prefer believing – that he will himself be re-born by his own children or grand children after he has died, so he does his best to make life as good as possible for those who comes after him. He will not deplete any resources or chop down entire woods for profit, because he knows that he will himself need them in his next life. All he does well in this life will be to his own benefit in his next, and he will only be reborn if he lives and dies with Honour.

 The European Religion is not just our religion; it is the quintessence of the European man! The mind and spirit of Europe! Without the European Religion the European man is like a computer without software (e. g. an Atheist), or with software that is not or only partly compatible with the hardware (e. g. Buddhist) or even with malicious software (like a virus) working to destroy everything inside (e. g. a Christian or Muslim). He is not working properly, if at all, and he will crash. Re-boot if you like, every time you crash, but be prepared to crash again and keep crashing until you remove all viruses and install the right software.
As basis of your faith you take the history of a foreign folk, precisely the Jews. Don't you have any history of your own? Must you then always search for the foreign, where the native lies so close? The history of our folk is our holy scripture. It is written with blood. When I today look into the Old Testament with non-Christian eyes, this unholy scripture, then I am gripped by a sacred rage how long one fed us Germans with this scoundrel stories; in us simply, blind, harmless Germans killed the faith in ourselves so that Jewry would appear in the right light. Between the lines I then see the Jew grinning, the eternal denier and destroyer, this parasitical, chosen devil folk. As long as we were not seeing, so long were we poor.
Kurt Eggers.

About European Morals

By Varg Vikernes.

http://thuleanperspective.com/2014/06/09/about-european-morals/

 One thing that is rather odd, is that Christians seems to think that they have some sort of monopoly on morals and good behaviour, that the Europeans before the Christianisation were just a bunch of amoral lunatics, raping, killing, pillaging, drinking and having no moral attitudes or self discipline whatsoever. They are often Christians because they are good and moral themselves (they are Europeans in blood after all), and wrongly believe that they need to take the consequence of that and therefore become or remain Christians. They know no other good and moral alternative.

 Many modern so-called "Pagans" seems to think the same, and mistake Heathendom with Hedonism, and use their cartoonish mock-Paganism as an excuse to be amoral and live what the Christians would call ‘a life in sin’ – and what a real Pagan would call ‘a life without Honour’.

Well, I have no problems with what is perceived as traditional ‘Christian’ values and morals: loyalty, family values, kindness, honesty, self discipline (or ‘moderation’) etc.. But let me be perfectly clear: these are not ‘Christian’ values! These are values the Christians adopted from Paganism – or rather kept – when they were Christianized. You can even argue that these are values they kept in spite of the Christianisation: these are the European values the Judeo-Christians failed to eradicate, when they created the Christian cult to destroy Rome (and later the rest of Europe).

 As a Pagan European I am not the opposite of Christian Europeans. My problem with them is not their morals, but their embrace of an international and genocidal religion bent on mixing all races and destroying all cultures and religions on this planet – and replace them all with just ‘Christians’ (of any race or any mix) and Judeo-Christian culture. They have done their best to destroy our European culture for more than a thousand years, and they still try to complete this task.

 When you meet Europeans who identify themselves as ‘Christians’, remember this: they don’t need Christianity to justify being moral. The exact same good values and morals are embraced in our European religion too. Paganism is not a excuse to sleep around, drink, take drugs or in other ways behave like a complete idiot. Paganism is the foundation on which all good traditions and morals stand! And unlike Christianity, Paganism is without dangerous alien influence, or even alien control, from some non-European tribe not at all friendly towards Europe and European culture. And unlike Christianity, Paganism is friendly towards all other non-aggressive and non-expansionist religions and cultures on this planet, and seek not to destroy them and replace them with the worship of one non-European tribe and their self-proclaimed right to destroy and enslave all others.

 All Christian Europeans who seriously want to ensure the survival of Europe as a biological entity should open their eyes to this, cast the anti-European and Anti-White Christianity aside like a wet towel, and become real Europeans again. Only a Pagan European is ‘a European mind in a European body’.

 Hail the European Gods! Hail and Joy!

Master Morality and Slave Morality


The initial, original, primordial and especially natural forms of what we call "morality" were established by the warrior aristocracies and other leader castes of ancient civilizations. These were the biological, mental and spiritual elite of ancient peoples.

 The Master Morality is based on faith in themselves, self pride, in strength, in beauty and health. According to the moral of lords, the gifted has no obligation to abide by the standards of those who are weaker than him, and all his actions are obeying natural laws as a truly noble personality, they are like actions of a lion before his prey that would not be seen as "good" or "evil" but would be "beyond good and evil".

 They consider good, everything superior and proud, strong and dominating, the constant struggle of life. Despise as bad everything that is the result of cowardice, fear, compassion, everything is weak and diminishes the vital impulse.

 By contrast, the Slave Morality is born by the resentment of the oppressed, the sick, the weak and the loser, and it was a reaction to the Master Morality. They starting to condemn the values and qualities of the powerful. Once denigrated the power, the order, the glory of the lords, the slave comes to decree as "good" the qualities of the weak and exalts vices presenting them as virtues and spread them to the world.

 The slaves create a morality that make easier their slave and incapable status. Since slaves are weak and can’t act under the rules of the stronger, they promote values such as meekness, submission, resignation, conformism, humility, compassion, mercy, pacifism, tolerance, equality, glorifying weakness and mediocrity and criticizing the power, the passion, the supremacy, pride, excellence, glory and strength:
Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted. Blessed are the meek, For they shall inherit the earth. 
-Matthew, 5:3-5.
Has not God made foolish the wisdom of this world? (...) For you see your calling, brethren, that not many wise according to the flesh, not many mighty, not many noble, are called. But God has chosen the FOOLISH things of the world to put to shame the wise, and God has chosen the WEAK things of the world to put to shame the things which are mighty; and the BASE things of the world and the things which are despised God has chosen, and the things which are not, to bring to nothing the things that are, that no flesh should glory in His presence. 
-1 Corinthians 1:26-29. 

 Slave morality is incompatible with Nature and its laws, since suppresses instincts and vital impulses.

 According to Nietzsche:

The Jews achieved that miracle of inversion of values thanks to which life on earth has for a couple millennia acquired a new and dangerous fascination--their prophets fused 'rich', 'godless', 'evil', 'violent', 'sensual' into one and were the first to coin the word 'world' as a term of infamy. It is this inversion of values (with which is involved the employment of the word for 'poor' as a synonym for 'holy' and 'friend') that the significance of the Jewish people resides: with them there begins the slave revolt in morals.

-Beyond Good and Evil (§ 195)

The "Improvers" of Mankind"

At all times morality has aimed to "improve" men — this aim is above all what was called morality. Under the same word, however, the most divergent tendencies have been concealed. But "improvement" has meant both taming the beast called man, and breeding a particular kind of man. Such zoological concepts are required to express the realities — realities of which the typical "improver," the priest, admittedly neither knows anything nor wants to know anything.

 To call the taming of an animal its "improvement" sounds almost like a joke to our ears. Whoever knows what goes on in kennels doubts that dogs are "improved" there. They are weakened, they are made less harmful, and through the depressive effect of fear, through pain, through wounds, and through hunger, they become sickly beasts. It is no different with the tamed man whom the priest has "improved."

 In the early Middle Ages, when the church was indeed, above all, a kennel, the most perfect specimens of the "blond beast" were hunted down everywhere; and the noble Teutons, for example, were "improved." But how did such an "improved" Teuton look after he had been drawn into a monastery? Like a caricature of man, a miscarriage: he had become a "sinner," he was stuck in a cage, tormented with all sorts of painful concepts. And there he lay, sick, miserable, hateful to himself, full of evil feelings against the impulses of his own life, full of suspicion against all that was still strong and happy. In short, a "Christian."

 Physiologically speaking: in the struggle with beasts, making them sick may be the only way to make them weak. The church understood this: it sickened and weakened man — and by so doing "improved" him.
-Friedrich Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, The "Improvers" of Mankind, 2.





Christianity's Nihilism

Christianity is a nihilistic worldview, a doctrine of suffering and meekness because it evades the challenge of finding a meaning in earthly life. Life for Christians is a "Valley of Tears" and it only makes sense if they reach the "Kingdom of God, the "afterlife", ie, something 'outside life'.

A preaching of death that inhibits all the exuberance of life and detracts it. A teaching of just the opposite of life: submission, surrender, defeat, and an attitude of passivity towards the challenges of life. Life always has been a constant struggle, but some blind and psychopathic people want to teach us another way.
Christianity was from the beginning, essentially and fundamentally, life's nausea and disgust with life, merely concealed behind, masked by, dressed up as, faith in "another" or "better" life. 
-Friedrich Nietzsche, The Birth of Tragedy, p.23.
The Gospel was originally an apocalyptic and eschatological message, a predication of the imminent "end of the world". The faith of Jesus and his disciples was on this issue solid as a rock, so any issue of physical life had little relevance to them and for early Christians. They did not show the slightest interest in science, art and culture, and indeed, it was not until three centuries later that there was a Christian art. Christianity is, from its inception, a doctrine that prepares men for the "Kingdom of God"; the "afterlife"; the death.
My kingdom is not of this world (...) my kingdom is from another place. 
-John 18:36. 
If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple.
-Luke 14:26.
Mankind wanted desperately to be released from this old nihilism, but to do so, it had to take atheism and thus was born a new nihilism: a godless society in which, however, it continues to perceive life in Judeo-Christian terms and drags the whole essence of his moral: The Slave Morality.

 So, the need to transcend this rotten state of things is increasingly evident, and the only way to do that is through the union with the ancient powers of Nature, but in the way according to the own spirituality of each race, preserving each one their own identity and their own characteristics that make them unique. Only in this way we can reach the transmutation of all values that will lead to find the true meaning of life.

 A picture is worth a thousand words. Take a look of what horrible these images are. They reflect the rottenness, decay, putrefaction, and decline of Spirit. Christianity is the cult to Death and the Denial of Life.

Divisive essence of Abrahamic Monotheism


The whole history of Abrahamic monotheism is evidence of a constant religious instability, an atmosphere of conflict and fragmentation, as arid as the desert from which it comes, due to their inherent bigotry and fanaticism. 


Jews originated when they were separated from Semitic polytheistic community (Canaanites) taking one of the gods of their regional pantheon as the one true god. Among Jews, in addition to Zealots and Essenes emerged factions, facing each other, like the Pharisees and Sadducees.

From the Jews, those who believed that Yeshua (Jesus) was the Messiah, they were separated from those who do not accept him as such, calling themselves as "Christians". Later, when Christianity spreads through Greece and Rome like an epidemic, there were originated many Christian sects.

In the seventh century, Islam appears, adopting beliefs of both Judaism and Christianity and subsequently confront Jews and Christians in bloody political and religious wars, and then divide them in other Islamic sects.

In 1054, the church was divided into Orthodox and Catholic, and against these, hundreds of years later in the 16th century Protestants clashed, which in turn diversified into numerous denominations (Lutherans, Methodists, Calvinists, Baptists, Anglicans , Pentecostals, Adventists, etc.) In the words of the Greek philosopher of the second century, Celsus:
That spirit of faction is such even today among Christians, that if all men would become Christians, they would not tolerate it. Originally, when they were a small number, were all animated by the same sentiments; after they became in crowds, were divided into sects and each one tries to form a separate group, as they did originally. Once isolated from the great majority, anathematize each other, having only in common, properly the name of Christians, by which all them fight. This is the only thing that would have the nerve to leave; because otherwise some profess one thing and some another.
-Celsus, A Discourse against the Christians. Chapter III. 
From this inconsistent and divisive behavior, typical of abrahamism, atheists and materialists have a bunch of nonsenses to create a false image of religion as universally inconsistent and divisive.

Christianity has always been characterized from its beginnings by their intolerance and intransigence, considering himself as the only way of salvation for all men on the planet; these features were inherited by Judaism, from which it came. It demonstrated that, paradoxically, the belief of considering equal to all human beings is the greatest form of intolerance, since it is assumed as dogma of faith that the same religion or morality is valid and binding for all men, and therefore they are imposed to them, even against their will. This aspect was later renewed with the following large and virulent egalitarian doctrines of the French Revolution and Communism.

Pagans, accepting the difference between peoples, also accepted that they worship different gods to theirs and had different customs, and they would never have thought of preaching their own religion or morals outside of their own people. It would have been ridiculous for them to preach the worship of Odin among black people, for example, and it was indifferent to them that Semitic peoples worship Moloch.

What is Cultural Christianity?


The poison of the doctrine of "equal rights for all"—it was Christianity that spread it most fundamentally. Out of the most secret nooks of bad instincts, Christianity has waged war unto death against all sense of respect and feeling of distance between man and man, that is to say, against the presupposition of every elevation, of every growth of culture; out of the ressentiment of the masses it forged its chief weapon against us, against all that is noble, high-minded on earth, against our happiness on earth. "Immortality" conceded to every Peter and Paul has so far been the greatest, the most malignant, attempt to assassinate noble humanity. 
-Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist, 43.

Christianity is the first globalist, egalitarian and political correctness movement of history. It emerged from Judaism and was preached to the Gentiles in revenge for the Roman occupation and the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem. It preaches the abandonment of life, depressing the vital impulses of mankind, turning it away from everything that makes the human being a living being, and in an existential sense, drawing him toward death and nothingness with promises of "eternal life" and promoting a kind of morality that exalts the weaknesses and vices presenting them as virtues, spreading them around the world as a poisonous plague.


Brainwashing runs deep over generations... 
There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus.

-Galatians, 3:28.

Christianity is the decadent form of the Ancient World. The French Revolution, Egalitarianism and Communism are successors of Christianity: It has instinctively hostile to caste, the aristocracy, the last privileges. It is the extreme tyranny of the sick, the weak, the mediocre, the dispossessed, the deprived of life. 

 Cultural Christianism or Cultural Christianity (C.C.) is the mindset based on this nihilistic and parasitic doctrine, opposed to the authentic European spirit. C.C. Is the secular continuation of a doctrine of suffering, slavery and meekness. It is the cult of death, the denial of life and the denial of beauty and Nature.

 C.C is nothing more and nothing less than the same Political Correctness (P.C.) of old times adapted to these times. And it allowed the conditions for Cultural Marxism (C.M.) and "all the pathologies of the modern world", as french philosopher Alain de Benoist said.

"The pathologies of the modern world are genuine, albeit illegitimate daughters of Christian theology"
-Alain de Benoist.


It was the nonsense of Christianity what lead to Modernism, Progressivism, Relativism, Marxism, Atheism, Hedonism. People were so tired of the absurdity of Christianity that was willing to accept anything that would oppose it, even if it was just as absurd as it. 
"Only when God has been radically thought, as the Christian God, it's when it can be radically denied." 
-Alain de Benoist.
It was not the abandoning of "Christiandom" what caused all this destructive ideologies, but the terrible continuation of its Morality and Ethics.

Or wasn't the Christianity's endorsement of such ideas as "universalism", "egalitarianism", "pacifism", "world brotherhood", and "universal altruism" what helped to establish and legitimize the ethics and politics invoked by Bolshevism and Communism, and also by French Revolution in 1789?

Why Christianity started it all?
  1. Before Christianity, there was not an ideology which consider everyone as equal, nor seek that everyone believes in the same things.
  2. Christianity was the first way in which Jewish thinking and Jewish concepts infiltrated into Europe.
  3. Before Christianity, there was not a parasite-ideology which massively invaded the spirit of an entire nation, converting many of their members into traitors to their own people and national traditions.
A follower of our Facebook page told us he once encountered a Jew there who openly bemoaned the fact that it's impossible to cultivate a guilt complex in Asians, like it's successfully done with Europeans. "The Japanese are simply immune to all of it", he wrote, "when you confront them with their historical crimes, they just smile and try to change the subject". So, when you come to think of it: what exactly makes Cultural Marxism so successful in Western countries, whereas it completely fails in Asia? The answer is, of course, Christianity. Without this perverse cult of guilt and self-hatred, disguised under the mask of "love and tolerance", the Jews would have never been able to subjugate Europe. Christianity was the "Trojan Horse" against Europe, poisoning its original ethos.

Political Correctness

"Politically incorrect" is the modern term equivalent to what was considered "heretical" by the Christian Church which was the main political institution during the Middle Ages and was dedicated to dismantle those heresies by the Inquisition. In modern political correctness we can identify several homologous elements to those of ancient ecclesiastical Inquisition:
  • A new Church: the System.
  • New unquestionable dogma: equality, feminism, multiculturalism, LGBT ideology.
  • A new inquisition: the media, the press, lobbies, Democrats, banquers, corrupt scientists, bureaucrats, political left and right.
  • New Temples: universities, international institutions and "museums of tolerance".
  • New heretics: revisionists, dissident scientists, nationalists and patriots.
  • New untouchable taboo: genetic engineering, human races, Eugenics, white geNOcide, etc.
  • New witch-hunts: scandals and lawsuits to dissidents or anyone suspected of "racism" or patriotism.
  • A new Satan: Hitler.
  • New stakes: ostracism, defamation, sentencing, imprisonment, boycotts and even direct physical aggression.
  • New repentant pioneers "Galileo-style" as English scientist James Watson, who recanted his "racist" phrase in 2007, under penalty of being burned at the stake of the mass media.

The ideological source of this P.C. is in the "Slave Morality".

 The moral slave responds to the archetype of the sick, the non-competititve and evolutionary loser. He doesn't get his pleasure from personal triumph of rising upward, nor from striving to look like who is better than him, but from seeing how every noble, strong, promising, pure and innocent thing corrupts until get down to their own level. The premises of this psychopathic individual, who has existed since the dawn of civilization, are:

  1. "I am unhappy".
  2. "Somebody has to be guilty that I am unhappy".
  3. "That somebody is not me, but those who are not unhappy".
  4. "As I am unhappy, the world has to pay and everyone must be just as unhappy as me. I must not reform me, but the world must be reshaped to suit me, and only then I will be happy".
  5. "Everything what is noble, pure, eternal, permanent, victorious or requires an act of will by the spirit, is a summit inaccessible to me. Its height and shadow offends me, because my ego has been artificially swollen and it believes that is the only valid one. I must not get down my ego, but the summit that bothers me".

This is the force behind all acts of this dangerous people, who have, consciously or not, the effect of making the world a worse place to live. The dogma of Political Correctness, ie, Cultural Marxism, ie, Cultural Christianism is killing Europe.



The Preachers of Death

There are preachers of death: and the earth is full of those to whom desistance from life must be preached. Full is the earth of the superfluous; marred is life by the many-too-many. May they be decoyed out of this life by the "eternal life"! 

- "The yellow ones": so are called the preachers of death, or "the black ones." But I will show them unto you in other colours besides.There are the terrible ones who carry about in themselves the beast of prey, and have no choice except lusts or self-laceration. And even their lusts are self-laceration.

 They have not yet become men, those terrible ones: may they preach desistance from life, and pass away themselves! There are the spiritually consumptive ones : hardly are they born when they begin to die, and long for doctrines oi lassi tude and renunciation.

 They would fain be dead, and we should approve of their wish! Let us beware of awakening those dead ones, and of damaging those living coffins! They meet an invalid, or an old man, or a corpse and im mediately they say: "Life is refuted! But they only are refuted, and their eye, which seeth only one aspect of existence. 

 Shrouded in thick melancholy, and eager for the little casualties that bring death : thus do they wait, and clench their teeth. Or else, they grasp at sweetmeats, and mock at their childish ness thereby: they cling to their straw of life, and mock at their still clinging to it.

 Their wisdom speaketh thus: "A fool, he who remaineth alive; but so far are we fools! And that is the foolishest thing in life!" "Life is only suffering": so say others, and lie not. Then see to it that ye cease! See to it that the life ceaseth which is only suffering!

 And let this be the teaching of your virtue: "Thou shalt slay thyself! Thou shalt steal away from thyself!" "Lust is sin," so say some who preach death "let us go apart and beget no children!" "Giving birth is troublesome," say others "why still give birth? One beareth only the unfortunate!" And they also are preachers of death.

"Pity is necessary," so saith a third party. "Take what I have! Take what I am! So much less doth life bind me!" Were they consistently pitiful, then would they make their neighbours sick of life. To be wicked that would be their true goodness. But they want to be rid of life; what care they if they bind others still faster with their chains and gifts!

 And ye also, to whom life is rough labour and disquiet, are ye not very tired of life? Are ye not very ripe for the sermon of death? All ye to whom rough labour is dear, and the rapid, new, and strange ye put up with yourselves badly; your diligence is flight, and the will to self-forgetfulness.

 If ye believed more in life, then would ye devote yourselves less to the momentary. But for waiting, ye have not enough of capacity in you nor even for idling!

 Everywhere resoundeth the voices of those who preach death; and the earth is full of those to whom death hath to be preached. Or "eternal life"; it is all the same to me if only they pass away quickly! 

-Friedrich Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra.
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)